[600MRG] 639m Access: Part 5 or Part 97?

[Warren K2ORS]

Mike,

    I seriously doubt that one impacted the other, the Experimental 
branch is under OET and the Amateur is under Wireless, I get the 
impression that they don't talk to each other much if at all.

73 Warren



On 3/24/2015 10:10 AM, Michael Mussler wrote:
> There’s another angle on the status of the 630m ham band that hasn’t been covered by the recent discussion. Has the flurry of Part 5 applications for access to this part of the spectrum had some bearing on the FCC consideration for the Part 97 (Amateur) allocation? As someone pointed out, Parts 5 and 97 are totally separate in the FCC regulations. Is it possible that the Part 5 license activity has delayed the Part 97 request as an attempt to consider possible conflicts between future uses of this spectrum?
>
> I’m not making any judgements one way or the other about the utility of the Part 5 licenses for 630m access. I honestly don’t know how the FCC views or manages these matters and pose this question with the hope that someone more familiar with the process can weigh in.
>
> 73
> Mike
> AI8Z
> WD2XSH/12
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 600MRG mailing list
> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com