[600MRG] License class

[Chris - KC0TKS]

Eric,

Yes, any beacons would be WSPR. It is probably the only practical mode 
that a QRP beacon would stand a chance of being copied with. Just wasn't 
sure of the technicalities involved with registering multiple locations 
with the UTC.

Thanks for the reply.

73,

Chris - KC0TKS




On 09/16/2017 12:09 PM, Eric NO3M wrote:
> The bands (630M and 2200M) will only be available to General class and 
> higher.
>
> Registering his location and beaconing under your own call would be 
> acceptable as far as I understand.  However, as a matter of etiquette, 
> I would recommend using WSPR if you plan to beacon.  I don't know if 
> there is an informal bandplan carve-out for CW and QRSS beacons, but 
> with such limited space, WSPR is far more friendly and productive, 
> given that data is uploaded to a central database and available for 
> mining and study.
>
> 73 Eric NO3M / WG2XJM
>
> On 09/16/2017 12:23 PM, Chris - KC0TKS wrote:
>> I submitted my application to the UTC yesterday, looking forward to 
>> putting something on the air, however, I have a couple of questions.
>>
>> I have a friend that has acreage and is very interested in putting a 
>> station up but he is only a technician class. Are Techs permitted to 
>> operate on these new bands? If not, can I register his location in 
>> addition to mine with the UTC and operate a beacon at his house under 
>> my call if approved?
>>
>> Chris - KC0TKS
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 600MRG mailing list
> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com