[600MRG] No APPROVAL received

[Paul Staupe]

By the way attached to my approvals there was also a note of apology for
the delay from the UTC.  We must be keeping them very busy!

73,

Paul W0AD

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Paul Staupe <staupe at gmail.com> wrote:

> Although I agree with all that everyone has said about the language of the
> law, I also have been waiting a little bit extra to see if I'd be getting a
> note.
>
> Sure enough an hour ago I received two separate approval emails, one for
> each band.
>
> They must be going over each case individually and either didn't expect
> such a large response or don't have the resources to get the approvals out
> in a timely manner.  Better late than never!
>
> 73,
>
> Paul W0AD
> WD2XSH/30
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Brian, WA1ZMS <wa1zms at att.net> wrote:
>
>> I agree 100% with Warren. You have followed the Rules as they are written.
>>
>> No need to flag-down the police car to double check that you weren't
>> really speeding as you drove by him.
>>
>> -Brian, WA1ZMS
>> iPhone
>>
>> > On Oct 23, 2017, at 9:35 AM, k2ors at verizon.net wrote:
>> >
>> > Chris,
>> >
>> >
>> >   On a serious note, you are better off not asking. You are likely to
>> get hold of someone who is not clear about what you are asking and the safe
>> bureaucratic response will be a firm "NO".
>> >   You are absolutely clear to transmit as they have let the 30 day
>> clock run out.
>> >
>> >
>> > 73 Warren
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Chris - KC0TKS <kc0tks at cmsdigital.net>
>> > To: 600mrg <600mrg at w7ekb.com>
>> > Sent: Sun, Oct 22, 2017 9:36 pm
>> > Subject: Re: [600MRG] No APPROVAL received
>> >
>> > I made two UTC submissions, one for my home QTH on Sept. 15 and another
>> > for a second possible transmit site three days later. Home is served by
>> > a big conglomerate, 2nd site is served by a small local co-op. Did not
>> > receive a response for either application. I know that a no-response is
>> > the same as an approval but antenna construction is going to be
>> > difficult so I don't really want to start anything until I know
>> > something for sure. Guess I will get on the phone and start begging. Who
>> > do I call, the water dept.? (sarcasm)
>> >
>> >
>> > Chris - KC0TKS
>> >
>> > Sedalia, MO
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 10/22/2017 08:44 AM, Bob Confrey wrote:
>> >> I have not yet received my approval for 630 and 2200 M.  Applied 1 day
>> >> after the site opened.  My power does come from an EMC ( electric
>> >> membership counsel ) and I live in a very rural area. No reason I
>> should
>> >> not be approved.  I'm wondering if the co-ops get these requests and
>> they
>> >> end up in the bit bucket?  I realize I'm technically good to go but do
>> not
>> >> like uncertainty, especially if it involves spending any money.
>> >>
>> >> Some have actually called the UTC ( KU4XR ) and gotten answers.  Not
>> sure I
>> >> really want to do that?  Or I could email.
>> >>
>> >> I really don't believe that there were that many applications for
>> >> approval.  Maybe 1000? maybe I'm wrong.
>> >>
>> >> Any thoughts?   I'm nowhere near ready to transmit anyway, perhaps I
>> should
>> >> sit tight......
>> >>
>> >> Bob
>> >>
>> >> WA1EDJ
>> >> Monroe, GA
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> 600MRG mailing list
>> >> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>> >> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > 600MRG mailing list
>> > 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>> > http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > 600MRG mailing list
>> > 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>> > http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 600MRG mailing list
>> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>>
>
>