[600MRG] W0RW's RST System

[D.J.J. Ring, Jr.]

It took my boss to correct about QRI1 as being the best quality signal, it
seemed to me that since QSA5 and QRK5 were the best report, on RT
(Radiotelephone) they called it "Fivers."  So I thought QRK3 was the best,
boy oh boy, was I WRONG.  At least I knew QRK only went from  1 to 3.  But
1 was the best.

Thanks, QRK5 QSA5 QRK1.

73
DR
David
N1EA

On Oct 21, 2017 23:01, "Neil Klagge" <w0yse at msn.com> wrote:

> Hi DR.
>
> I like the old version of QRK and QSA that you posted:
>
>
> QRK?  What is the intelligibility of my signals (or those of ...)?
> QRK The intelligibility of your signals (or those of ...) is ...
> 1. bad
> 2. poor
> 3. fair
> 4. good
> 5. excellent.
>
> QSA?
> What is the strength of my signals (or those of ...)?
>
> QSA The strength of your signals (or those of ...) is
> 1. scarcely perceptible
> 2. weak
> 3. fairly good
> 4. good
> 5. very good.
>
>
> The RST, with S and T going from 1 to 9 is a bit of overkill, it seems to
> me.
>
>
> 73
> Neil, w0yse
> Vancouver, *WA*
>
> My ham radio websites: http://w0yse.webs.com/ and http://wg2xsv.webs.com
> <http://wg2xsv.webs.com>
> My Faith website: http://neilsfaith.webs.com/
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* 600MRG <600mrg-bounces at w7ekb.com> on behalf of D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <
> n1ea at arrl.net>
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 21, 2017 7:40:26 PM
> *To:* Kenneth G. Gordon
> *Cc:* 600 meter group SHMRG
> *Subject:* Re: [600MRG] W0RW's RST System
>
> Yes, the old commercial usage is best:
>
> QRI
> QRI?  How is the tone of my transmission?
> QRI1 QRI2 QRI3
> The tone of your transmission is ...
> 1. good
> 2. variable
> 3. bad.
>
> QRK?  What is the intelligibility of my signals (or those of ...)?
> QRK The intelligibility of your signals (or those of ...) is ...
> 1. bad
> 2. poor
> 3. fair
> 4. good
> 5. excellent.
>
> QSA?
> What is the strength of my signals (or those of ...)?
>
> QSA The strength of your signals (or those of ...) is
> 1. scarcely perceptible
> 2. weak
> 3. fairly good
> 4. good
> 5. very good.
>
> QRK5 QSA5 QRI1
>
> for QRK and QSA better is higher number, but  for QRI better is lower
> number!
>
> 73
> DR
> N1EA WD2XSH/18
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Kenneth G. Gordon
> <kgordon2006 at frontier.com> wrote:
> > On 21 Oct 2017 at 23:32, Frank Lotito wrote:
> >
> >> Simpler yet - Q0 through Q5, with 0 meaning "I think something may be
> >> out there," to 5 meaning "blowing my earphones off."  As I vaguely
> >> recall, this 5-scale Q system was used by the "fone" guys some 50 or
> >> more years ago.  73 Frank K3DZ / WH2XHA
> >
> > I much prefer the old QRK 1-5 and QSA 1-5. Makes more sense to me.
> >
> > Ken W7EKB
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 600MRG mailing list
> > 600MRG at w7ekb.com
> > http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> 600MRG mailing list
> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>