[600MRG] Experimental Licenses Kaput?

[Warren K2ORS]

Mike,

      Nope, there was no consultation with UTC on Part 5 licenses. In 
fact, in one of the Utilities comments they said as much - that there 
were a small number of  experimental licenses and they didn't want 
amateurs just popping everywhere.


73 Warren


On 4/3/2017 5:48 AM, ab1aw wrote:
> I wonder if being granted a part 5 license is any indication of that station location not being near a PLC transmission line?  One would think that the UTC would not want a high power station near their lines.  If one is already operating a part 5 station, the UTC would be hard pressed to justify the denial of a part 97 station at that same location.
> MikeAB1AW  /  WI2XRE
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy Tab® S2
> -------- Original message --------From: Warren K2ORS <k2ors at verizon.net> Date: 4/2/17  9:00 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 600mrg at w7ekb.com Subject: Re: [600MRG] Experimental Licenses Kaput?
> Frank,
>
>     The Experimental Licenses are unrelated to the Amateur allocations.
> I think that as long as you pay your renewal fee on time you should be
> good to go. However it's my understanding that the ARRL won't renew WD2XSH.
>
>     I think that the Amateur allocation is a good thing, however I'm not
> even sure that I'll bother with getting on with my Amateur license, its
> a lot of hassle for very limited privileges.
>
>     I think of the Part 5 Experimental license days as the "Wild West"
> of 500kHz operation, we'll never see trans-Atlantic ssb contacts with
> 200W ERP power levels under the restrictive Amateur rules the way we did
> in the Part 5 days. I fondly remember picking up Part 5 stations
> hundreds of miles away on my Sony 2010 with its built in ferrite loop
> antenna, which will be impossible given the paltry power allowed under
> the Amateur rules.
>
> 73 Warren
>
>
>
> On 4/1/2017 10:12 PM, Frank Lotito wrote:
>> Regarding the two new "below the broadcast band" amateur radio frequency assignments, what happens with the Part 5 Experimental licenses (grants) we have?  If our Part 5 grant covers a different frequency range, including some or all of the new frequency ranges allocated to the Amateur Service, what call sign "must" we use when transmitting within the new amateur bands, our 47CFR97 amateur call or our 47CFR5 experimental call?  When our experimental grant is up for renewal, what's the likelihood will it be renewed?  Etc, etc.........
>>
>>
>> 73 Frank Lotito  K3DZ / WH2XHA
>> _______________________________________________
>> 600MRG mailing list
>> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>>

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus