[600MRG] spectrum change that might interest you.

[William E. Isakson]

Doc,   Warren pointed out my mistake on this one and I should not have made
this posting.  I had not noticed that the title was for 1780 MHz, not KHz.
 Way far afield from our interests.  Sorry.
Bill
--------


Bill Isakson
Roseburg, Oregon USA
bill.isakson at gmail.com




On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Tom "Doc" Gruis, KØHTF <k0htf at netins.net>wrote:

>
> Hi from Iowa!
>
>    The allocation of the spectrum and its seizure for auction is not a
> good thing.  It is kind of like when some in DC wanted to auction off the
> redwoods.  I feel it is good for those of us really involved in radio to
> keep a heads up on the government philosophy or policy about the natural
> resource called the "electromagnetic spectrum" especially since we are now
> hoping for the 630 meter and 173 Khz authorizations.  Just asking.
> Different technical details but the same control over them. Auctioning off
> the spectrum; is that a "green" thing to do? There are some nice wide
> amateur bands up in the UHF area.  Might they become vulnerable.
>
>   At my QTH I am noticing a strong seemingly carrier around 173 KHz. with
> some multiples.
>
>    I am capable of operating on all bands 160 through 1.2 GHz except 60
> meters.  As a broadcast engineer - olde First 'Phone with radar endorsement
> - the frequencies just above and below the AM band are of especial interest.
>
>    I am hoping to expand receiving capabilities on LF and low MF this fall
> and get somewhat into QRSS. Your postings on antennae and such are really
> appreciated from this "lurker."
>
> TNX ES 73,
>
> Doc.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren K2ORS" <k2ors at verizon.net>
> To: <600mrg at w7ekb.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 10:48
> Subject: Re: [600MRG] spectrum change that might interest you.
>
>
>
>  Bill,
>>
>>      How is 1755-1780 MHz relevant to 600 meters or ham radio??
>> 73 Warren
>>
>>
>> On 7/19/2013 11:45 AM, William E. Isakson wrote:
>>
>>> I thought that some of you might be interested in this new bill that was
>>> just introduced in congress.  I have not seen the text yet, just the
>>> title:
>>> H.R. 2739: To require the reallocation and auction for commercial use of
>>> the electromagnetic spectrum between the frequencies from 1755 megahertz
>>> to
>>> 1780 megahertz.<http://www.**govtrack.us/congress/bills/**
>>> 113/hr2739?utm_campaign=**govtrack_email_update&utm_**
>>> source=govtrack/email_update&**utm_medium=email<http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr2739?utm_campaign=govtrack_email_update&utm_source=govtrack/email_update&utm_medium=email>
>>> >
>>>
>>> Sponsor: Rep. Doris Matsui
>>> [D-CA6]<http://www.govtrack.**us/congress/members/doris_**matsui/400663<http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/doris_matsui/400663>
>>> >
>>>
>>> This bill is in the first stage of the legislative process. It was
>>> introduced into Congress on July 18, 2013. It will typically be
>>> considered
>>> by committee next.
>>> --------
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill Isakson
>>> Roseburg, Oregon USA
>>> bill.isakson at gmail.com
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> 600MRG mailing list
>>> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>>> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/**listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com<http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> 600MRG mailing list
>> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/**listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com<http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com>
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> 600MRG mailing list
> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/**listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com<http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com>
>