[600MRG] No APPROVAL received

[Marshall Cross]

Minor point, it was is not a law. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Paul Staupe <staupe at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Although I agree with all that everyone has said about the language of the
> law, I also have been waiting a little bit extra to see if I'd be getting a
> note.
> 
> Sure enough an hour ago I received two separate approval emails, one for
> each band.
> 
> They must be going over each case individually and either didn't expect
> such a large response or don't have the resources to get the approvals out
> in a timely manner.  Better late than never!
> 
> 73,
> 
> Paul W0AD
> WD2XSH/30
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Brian, WA1ZMS <wa1zms at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> I agree 100% with Warren. You have followed the Rules as they are written.
>> 
>> No need to flag-down the police car to double check that you weren't
>> really speeding as you drove by him.
>> 
>> -Brian, WA1ZMS
>> iPhone
>> 
>>> On Oct 23, 2017, at 9:35 AM, k2ors at verizon.net wrote:
>>> 
>>> Chris,
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  On a serious note, you are better off not asking. You are likely to
>> get hold of someone who is not clear about what you are asking and the safe
>> bureaucratic response will be a firm "NO".
>>>  You are absolutely clear to transmit as they have let the 30 day clock
>> run out.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 73 Warren
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chris - KC0TKS <kc0tks at cmsdigital.net>
>>> To: 600mrg <600mrg at w7ekb.com>
>>> Sent: Sun, Oct 22, 2017 9:36 pm
>>> Subject: Re: [600MRG] No APPROVAL received
>>> 
>>> I made two UTC submissions, one for my home QTH on Sept. 15 and another
>>> for a second possible transmit site three days later. Home is served by
>>> a big conglomerate, 2nd site is served by a small local co-op. Did not
>>> receive a response for either application. I know that a no-response is
>>> the same as an approval but antenna construction is going to be
>>> difficult so I don't really want to start anything until I know
>>> something for sure. Guess I will get on the phone and start begging. Who
>>> do I call, the water dept.? (sarcasm)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris - KC0TKS
>>> 
>>> Sedalia, MO
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 10/22/2017 08:44 AM, Bob Confrey wrote:
>>>> I have not yet received my approval for 630 and 2200 M.  Applied 1 day
>>>> after the site opened.  My power does come from an EMC ( electric
>>>> membership counsel ) and I live in a very rural area. No reason I should
>>>> not be approved.  I'm wondering if the co-ops get these requests and
>> they
>>>> end up in the bit bucket?  I realize I'm technically good to go but do
>> not
>>>> like uncertainty, especially if it involves spending any money.
>>>> 
>>>> Some have actually called the UTC ( KU4XR ) and gotten answers.  Not
>> sure I
>>>> really want to do that?  Or I could email.
>>>> 
>>>> I really don't believe that there were that many applications for
>>>> approval.  Maybe 1000? maybe I'm wrong.
>>>> 
>>>> Any thoughts?   I'm nowhere near ready to transmit anyway, perhaps I
>> should
>>>> sit tight......
>>>> 
>>>> Bob
>>>> 
>>>> WA1EDJ
>>>> Monroe, GA
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 600MRG mailing list
>>>> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>>>> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 600MRG mailing list
>>> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>>> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 600MRG mailing list
>>> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>>> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 600MRG mailing list
>> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
>> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> 600MRG mailing list
> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
> 
> 
>