[600MRG] Fwd: Re: measuring noise level ?
Edward R Cole
kl7uw at acsalaska.net
Sun Jul 17 13:56:11 CDT 2016
Meant this to go to the list
>Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 10:45:54 -0800
>To: Frank Lotito <k3dz at live.com>
>From: Edward R Cole <kl7uw at acsalaska.net>
>Subject: Re: [600MRG] measuring noise level ?
>
>Definitely. if not specified for ham radio reports, I assume SSB bw
>of approx. 2.5-KHz.
>Elecraft receiver MDS spec using 500-Hz which subtracts 7 dB to
>measurements done at 2.5KHz. e.g. MDS of -144 dBm becomes -137 dBm at 2.5 KHz.
>
>Contrary to Elecraft I make all my MDS at 2.5-KHz. Partly because
>JT65 sw signal level readings are referenced using 2.5-KHz. Weak
>signal CW operators are capable of mentally filtering to bw ~ 50-Hz
>which means they can hear signals -17 dB from a reference at 2.5-KHz
>(SNR=0). Whereas JT65 signal can often be decoded at -27 dB and
>occasionally down to -29 dB (readings on the JT65 signal level indicator).
>
>I have done sun noise measurements using my SDR-IQ + transverter +
>preamp on 144-MHz (Y= 8 dB) and 1296-MHz (Y=16dB). Antenna gain is
>21-dBi on 144 and 34-dBic on 1296. Below 50-MHz sky noise swamps
>out sun noise on most antenna systems (excepting very large eme
>arrays). Bw = 190-KHz.
>
>Most HF noise variance is man-made. I see a rise from S2 to S4/5 on
>6m when I point NE vs SE. City of Anchorage is NE at 98-km from me
>(coincidence?).
>
>My noise floor using my invert-L on 495-KHz usually runs about -110
>dBm (0.7uv) using my SDR-IQ running Spectravue in 2.5-KHz bw (SSB
>mode). But I have seen nights it rises to -90 dBm. SDR-IQ without
>antenna shows noise floor of -134 dBm.
>
>73, Ed
>
>At 09:46 AM 7/17/2016, you wrote:
>>Don't forget, the "noise"measured, be it dBm, uV, S-Units, etc. is
>>also "bandwidth" dependent. I would also submit, for complete
>>receive systems, a noise measurement is also directional, such a
>>sweeping across the path of the sun with a VHF, UHF, SHF or
>>microwave antenna. If the noise peaks, Great; if the noise does
>>not peak your aim is off, or your total system is lacking. Ditto
>>when your HF yagi is aimed in certain directions.
>>73 Frank K3DZ / WH2XHA
>>________________________________________
>>From: 600MRG <600mrg-bounces at w7ekb.com> on behalf of Edward R Cole
>><kl7uw at acsalaska.net>
>>Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2016 12:13 PM
>>To: 600mrg at w7ekb.com
>>Subject: Re: [600MRG] measuring noise level ?
>>
>>Most likely the poster of that noise measurement intended to say -85
>>dBm. Spectravue provides direct level measurements of signal and
>>noise on a waterfall display. Most SDR sw do this.
>>
>>All modern service equipment show signal level in dBm. I hear almost
>>no one using uv anymore (unless they are audiophiles). DBm are
>>direct measurement in power while uv is ac voltage which requires one
>>to specify the impedance if it is to relate to power.
>>
>>So would you rather S-meter reading be given - ha ha! Show me two
>>receivers that have s-meter properly calibrated.
>>
>>73, Ed - KL7UW
>>
>>At 07:26 AM 7/17/2016, sbjohnston at aol.com wrote:
>>
>> >I did not say there was no reason to be aware of noise - far from
>> >it. In both my amateur and my professional life the problem of
>> >radio noise is a very big deal. I just don't get the point of
>> >sharing a figure like "-85 dB".
>> >
>> >Decibels don't mean anything unless you provide the reference level
>> >to which your measurement is -85 dB down from.
>> >
>> >And without considering the gain or loss of the complete antenna
>> >system (or the bandwidth of the receive system in which you are
>> >adding up the noise) I can't see how you can compare station A to
>> >station B in a different location.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Steve WD8DAS
>> >
>> >sbjohnston at aol.com
>> >http://www.wd8das.net/
>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Radio is your best entertainment value.
>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >600MRG mailing list
>> >600MRG at w7ekb.com
>> >http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>>
>>73, Ed - KL7UW
>>http://www.kl7uw.com
>> "Kits made by KL7UW"
>>Dubus Mag business:
>> dubususa at gmail.com
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>600MRG mailing list
>>600MRG at w7ekb.com
>>http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>600MRG mailing list
>>600MRG at w7ekb.com
>>http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>
>73, Ed - KL7UW
>http://www.kl7uw.com
> "Kits made by KL7UW"
>Dubus Mag business:
> dubususa at gmail.com
73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
"Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
dubususa at gmail.com
More information about the 600MRG
mailing list