[600MRG] HF-MF band planning

[Carl]

Id also suggest that JT-9 be used for all MF and lower HF bands as it is far 
superior and the occupied bandwidth is much narrower than JT-65 plus its 
attendent poor IMD from poorly adjusted equipment. It has already ruined 
part of the 160M DX window on 1838.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Mussler" <mmussler at wispertel.net>
To: "Rudy Severns" <n6lf at epud.net>
Cc: "600MRG" <600mrg at w7ekb.com>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [600MRG] HF-MF band planning


>I made a similar response; including MF for their consideration.
>
> -Mike/12
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 600MRG mailing list
> 600MRG at w7ekb.com
> http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4335 / Virus Database: 3705/7146 - Release Date: 03/03/14
>